BAD wrote:
CJK,
WOW! You caught me totally off guard. I never expected you of all people to think that way. Well it is your opinion and you are entittled to it. I guess once UruLive opens I won't be seeing you in UU either.
Uru Live will give true bug fixes (versus workarounds) and improvements. With UU, that is simply not possible. For instance, the UU update fixed a bug in the client relating to colliders. That could not have been fixed otherwise (only worked around) once the issue was identified as a bug in the client, as we have no source code. Fixing a problem in the client itself usually requires fixing the error in the source and recompiling a new client.
The server-side bugs can be resolved via the Alcugs project, so fixing server-side bugs is a possibility, with much work. To truly make UU a viable item, you would also need an Alcugs client for which we would have the source as well. I know
I do not have the ability to write such a client.
I would expect that with Uru Live, the lag issues will be fixed, and the low player per server ratio will be remedied, and new high quality content will be added on a regular basis. None of that is realistic in UU. And not to disparage the fan age creators (as I cannot do even that much), but all the fan ages I have seen are rather crude in comparison to Cyan's ages. I am quite sure that with time this will change, as the tools improve and people become more experienced, but that could take quite some time. And by that time, I would hope we would be able to see those high quality fan ages in Uru Live, as Cyan has suggested.
JKla wrote:
I know there are users out there who cannot complete Uru as it stands through no fault of their own. Users with impaired keyboard skills who have been enpowered by the use of the UserKI. Users who have made an on line community home there.
It is my opinion that Cyan will add accessability items into the new client. I have not seen them intentionally leave people out when they were aware of the possibility, and it would be extremely bad business to do so in any case.
I would recommend we hold off on this debate over what should be done with UU until
after Uru Live has been launched and we all have had the opportunity to try it. It is not possible to compare UU with it's bugs and quirks (which we have experienced) and the new Uru Live (which we have not yet experienced and truly know nothing about).
Tomala wrote:
It's about the people to me, forget that and we have nothing.
Exactly! Only difference so far between UU and Uru Live is that none of us will have administrative powers, which does not matter to me. As long as the capability of having your own neighborhood still exists, people can gather and meet on the new Uru Live product in private, if they so choose. So we should all at least
try Uru Live before deciding our opinions on UU's fate.