ventris
Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 27
Location: california
In the Archaeology thread it was suggested that perhaps the Concert Hall balcony might have special acoustic properties thus explaining what appears to be a suboptimal location for a performance space. A partial test of this theory would require someone to climb to the balcony while one or more researchers stationed themselves at the different observation points around the canyon. The researcher on the Balcony would then speak and the observers could discover if voice carried unusually far from the balcony. Last night a generous group of explorers donated part of their evening to the advancement of knowledge to test this idea.
I first approached Annabelle knowing the yawning chasm that so intimidated me would hold no terrors for her. True to her intrepid nature she was off to make the climb without waiting for the complicated justification. Quickly other explorers volunteered to man the observation spots. Unfortunately when Annabelle reached the lower balcony we discovered that she did not have all the proper equipment to make the test. We could see that our KI's did not give us the < > signal but a thorough test required voice.
DaVinci then valiantly volunteered to make the treacherous climb to the balcony bearing the appropriate equipment (a microphone). Having wisely tested beforehand that our equipment was compatible (he stood next to me and we talked) he managed to join Annabelle on the balcony.
Despite repeated efforts none of the explorers on the observation platforms were able to hear anything DaVinci said. The observer on the mall could hear him but was within the normal range of spoken voice.
This does not absolutely rule out special acoustic properties of the balcony. DaVinci did not get his equipment into the upper balcony. The canyon's acoustics may also have been altered by the earthquake damage which is so evident. This however was probably the best test that could be conducted until someone gains access to the upper balcony or Concert Hall.
Thanks again to those who kindly indulged my curiosity.
As a side note, Davinci reported that he could not see evidence of a doorway in the lower balcony but that there was enough damage to obscure such evidence. I did not think to ask him to check for a trap door from above or below.
I first approached Annabelle knowing the yawning chasm that so intimidated me would hold no terrors for her. True to her intrepid nature she was off to make the climb without waiting for the complicated justification. Quickly other explorers volunteered to man the observation spots. Unfortunately when Annabelle reached the lower balcony we discovered that she did not have all the proper equipment to make the test. We could see that our KI's did not give us the < > signal but a thorough test required voice.
DaVinci then valiantly volunteered to make the treacherous climb to the balcony bearing the appropriate equipment (a microphone). Having wisely tested beforehand that our equipment was compatible (he stood next to me and we talked) he managed to join Annabelle on the balcony.
Despite repeated efforts none of the explorers on the observation platforms were able to hear anything DaVinci said. The observer on the mall could hear him but was within the normal range of spoken voice.
This does not absolutely rule out special acoustic properties of the balcony. DaVinci did not get his equipment into the upper balcony. The canyon's acoustics may also have been altered by the earthquake damage which is so evident. This however was probably the best test that could be conducted until someone gains access to the upper balcony or Concert Hall.
Thanks again to those who kindly indulged my curiosity.
As a side note, Davinci reported that he could not see evidence of a doorway in the lower balcony but that there was enough damage to obscure such evidence. I did not think to ask him to check for a trap door from above or below.
_________________
I'll look that up BRB




