jmdoggett wrote:
Look Rand didn't answer a question about a code repository. He was asked specifically about the server code. And I WOULD turn my nose up at them running that. I desire to build my own universe out of the entire OS code. Yes, I did desire to run MOUL too, but that isn't gonna happen. If it was he would have simply said "Yep, we are releasing everything listed on the website. We have to yank out a couple pieces we don't own."
Yes, he did. To copypasta from your very own quote not so long ago in this very thread:
Rand wrote:
...so we still have no other plans other than to do Open Source and like to move it out there
jmdoggett wrote:
Gee that was easy.
But that is not what happened. Like I said, I've seen and heard that song before. What I think happened is they changed their minds about what they wanted to OS. I dont have a problem with that, its their work. What I have a problem with is them dancing around the issue and not being clear, precise and timely in putting out information. Twice he said what they want is content from the community.
Rand was trying to clarify there current position. It can be broken down like this:
- We are still doing Open Source, however
- We have third-party code within the source we can't distribute
- We also have paying work we are doing
- Therefore, Paying work takes priority, followed by removing all third-party code we don't have the legal right to distribute/open source, and finally releasing the source to the community in a complete and working state
- Sometime in the (near) future, we would like to run our own game server, which may have approved "community" ages on it
If they don't release "working" source, it will be very difficult for an outside developer to debug and write back in the third-party libraries they have had to write out, thus they want to release a "ready to compile" package that can then be worked upon.
jmdoggett wrote:
Rand presented in his own way notification of Cyan's change of plans. I'm not interpreting anything. What he said is very clear.
Evidently not, as you are misreading the "very clear" statements he has already made.
jmdoggett wrote:
I don't have anything else to say on this subject. If you want to kid yourself into thinking they will release everything OS, more power to you.
I'm not kidding myself, or anyone else. They will release everything Open Source. They have committed to that wholeheartedly, and when they have the time and resources to do so, they will. It is just that there are some minor technical and monetary issues they need to overcome first.
You seem to be misconstruing far to much from the "We want to run a server", reading it as "we want to run the only server", which is not the case at all.